نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
In general, in order to prevent any mistakes and errors in the votes issued by the judicial bodies, as well as the violation of the rights of individuals, it is possible to object to these votes if there is any similarity. One of the methods of protesting the order issued by the court is the third party objection, which is foreseen in order to prevent harm to third parties, the person whose rights were harmed by the issuance of judicial (criminal or legal) rulings and who were not present during the proceedings. The article deals with the discussion and examination of the third party objection by persons only with the normal document and we review it and we discuss the ways of the third party objection to the order to prove the ownership of immovable property with the normal document and the principles and rules that are used in the issuance and cancellation of it by the issuing court. We will check the principles of the following votes, you can protest as a third party. 1. Legal opinions of public, revolution and appeal courts. 2. Opinions of the Court of Administrative Justice. 3. Arbitration votes. 4. All orders and appointments. But in this article, we examine the third objection in the lawsuit related to proof of ownership of immovable property.
کلیدواژهها English